A Critical Analysis of Par Fabian Lagerkvist’s “My Father and I” Essay

The nearsighted bill, My Father and I mainly revolves virtually the journey of a father and discussion into the countryside on a all right sunny day. The journey that they went on to took until darkness set in and the consume that they saw during daylight shifted from beautiful moving- determine showries to a horrible, at least in the eyes of a electric razor, dark collage of figures.The story showed how beauty underside turn into caution once one element went unwrap, in this case, the light. It as well shows the difference in the way of thinking between the father and the minor wherein the baby was so terrified while the father was as quieten as he is. This is evident in the disclose wherein both of them were way out through the stream where the child was as puzzled as to wherefore his father acted as if he felt nonhing while the child was very much afraid. The child went on to realize in the wipeout of the scam story that, like he has, his father likewise ha s fears entirely that the fear that it is the fear of the things that his father does not know.The author made his flow by taking the point of view of a little child who is naturally curious of the things that go round him. In the short story, the countersign is the one that narrates the whole story and it is his thoughts that the audience sees. This made him as the main focal point that the author social functiond. This way, the curiosity that is evident in both child is played upon by the author to effectively deliver a point of realization wherein the boy itself answered much of his questions.The father on the separate hand is the one the author used to depict the natural extend to that every parent has with their children. The actions of the father show him being protective and a motivator when his countersign was getting terrified of the darkness. The father also plays a major part in the climax wherein he himself felt fear for his child after a train came in and almos t take away them. The faith that he has in God somehow is the factor that also made the child solace yet puzzled.Lagerkvist efficiently made use of descriptive ways in painting out the positions in the short story. The narration of every detail was intricately laid out in order to obtain the proper intention in every part of the short story. His descriptions were so vivid that the reader may feel as though he was actually walking alongside the father and son on the railroad tracks all throughout the story. The structure and the plot of the short story are pretty much divided into two special and distinctive scenarios. First is the image of the railroad track and the environment around it. The author describes every detail that is necessary in order to estimate out the place and how the place is lit up by and also the manner it reacts to the sunlight. It basically describes for the reader to appreciate the beauty of the countryside and the harmony of the initiation they both ar e in evident with the front train scene wherein his father knows that the train whod passed by was a colleague of his. all this was changed after darkness set in at the countryside and the father and son went their way back home wherein the second main scene sets in. In this particular scene, all the main components that were described by the author during the first main scene met its opposite as the amount of light that was display before went gone and the effect made a gloomy picture that is terrifying for the child. The mood in this story then on went from calm during the first scene to become tense at the second scene especially in the part wherein an unknown train from absolutely nowhere popped out of the scene and even terrified the father. In general, the short story is an effective manifestation of the unconditional concern of parents for their children. The bond that was formed out of the situations in the short story made the child to realize the figure of everything th at happens around them and that the greatest fear that anyone has is the fear on things we do not know.ReferenceLagerkvist, Par. The Marriage Feast and Many Others. Chatto and Windus. 1955.